Cause
marketing, social responsibility, these seem to be the trendy buzz words these
days.
According
to a Cone Communications Study, consumers are showing increased willingness to
switch to brands that support a cause. In addition, consumers are expecting
companies to stand for something
For
this project I plan to look into what the drivers are for customers when it
comes to products and companies associated with a cause. How involved are the
customers in the actual cause? Does it matter whether the cause is personally
relevant to the customer or even related to the product/company? At this point,
I am still working on focusing my topic, so this blog will be more of a
sounding board to get my thoughts out on paper.
I
will look at companies that use cause marketing to drive sales and branding as
well as companies that use it as a business model. I thought it would be
interesting to compare companies like Toms, Sweet Riot, and TRU2U that use
cause marketing as a business model versus well-branded companies that are
starting to integrate causes into their brand image.
Aside
from a general interest in socially responsible companies, I have a personal
interest in supporting TRU2U. TRU2U is a new socially conscious apparel brand
that seeks to build awareness amongst consumers about fair labor practices and
furthermore to create a dialogue about social issues surrounding the products
we as consumers purchase regularly. The company takes the Toms business model a
step further to involve the consumers in a discussion, it’s not about what’s
right or wrong, it’s about understand the whole issue and the trade-offs involved.
The
connection between understanding the value of cause marketing/social
consciousness in companies and customer insights, as I see it, is the
involvement of the customer in the experience. Does a cause lead to more
customer involvement, does this ultimately build a deeper trust in the brand?
Is it important that consumers are involved in the entire process? I think
understanding why customers are choosing companies and products that support a
cause will help companies more effectively choose which causes to support and
better communicate their message.
Not
surprisingly considering the trend, there is no shortage of articles discussing
cause marketing recently. Many of them site a study from Cone Communications
that ended up going to directly for the best information. The Cone CauseEvolution Study reports findings regarding consumer attitudes towards company
support for social and environment issues. The study reports that 90% of
consumers want companies to tell them what they are doing to support issues. It
goes on to discuss consumer’s feelings towards brands related to a cause and
purchase behavior for those brands versus other brands. Target consumer segments
include Moms and millenials, since moms control a majority of household
purchases and millenials have billions in discretionary income to spend. The
report also lists the top issues consumers think companies should address as
well as which industries they most expect to support causes which include food
and beverage, automotive, and manufacturing. The study concludes with a report
on how employees feel about the companies they work for supporting causes.
One
article I read on Inc.com also brings up a good point about companies that use
cause marketing poorly. It says that if consumers discover any misstep or
insincerity behind a company’s cause, they will drop them. The problem is that
many consumers are usually not well informed on the issues that they claim to
support. TRU2U aims to change that attitude in customers. Their platform is to
inform college consumers about fair labor issues, and what they entails in a global
sense. While so many Americans may be quick to point out unfair working
conditions, they’re looking at the issue often times from a very ethnocentric
perspective. TRU2U wants to differentiate their products by teaching life
skills, educating, and training college students on these issues through
transparent marketing. There is a big grey area when it comes to social responsibility,
it’s not cut and dry. So I think it will be interesting to discuss how this new
focus on cause marketing will change consumer involvement in product
development.
Julie - This is certainly a hot topic as you say. One thing on the terminology - it used to be that cause marketing was a very specific thing: for-profit companies would donate a portion of their revenue from a specific program to a cause. It may be true that term has been broaden quite a bit, but just be sure you are using other search terms in your research. I like the idea of looking at mission-based companies, such as TOMs & TRU2U, but keep in mind that many people still believe they are anomalies and, so, it might be interesting for you to build the bridge between these mission-based organizations and more normal for-profit companies. Also, I'd be a little skeptical of that research, since consumers seem to overstate the degree to which they are interested in socially responsible companies - just be sure to critique that study and others based on survey data.
ReplyDelete